Representations Made To the UK Foreign Secretary about the Republic of Korea’s “Gag Law”

Dec 20, 2020 | Uncategorized

Representations Made To the UK Foreign Secretary about the Republic of Korea’s “Gag Law”

20 December, 2020
The Rt Hon Dominic Raab MP
Secretary of State
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development
Office
King Charles Street
London SW1A 2AH


Dear Foreign Secretary,

We are writing to bring to your attention and with our grave concerns legislation which
was passed by the National Assembly on 14 December 2020 in South Korea, to
amend the Inter-Korean Relations Development Act. This amendment is now awaiting
the signature and approval of President Moon Jae-in.
If enacted, the amendment would criminalise the distribution of materials or
broadcasting via loudspeakers and posting of placards information directed at North
Korea in the inter-Korean border areas. Such materials would include leaflets, USB
flash drives, CDs, books, and Biblical materials to North Korea through third countries,
such as China without governmental approval. The amendment reads as follows:

  1. The term “leaflets, etc.” means leaflets, goods (including promotional and
    propaganda materials, print materials and auxiliary storage devices), money or
    other property interests.
  2. The term “dissemination” means the act of distributing to unspecified multiple
    persons in North Korea or moving to North Korea leaflets, etc. (including simply
    moving leaflets, etc. via a third country. Hereinafter the same shall apply) for
    the purpose of propaganda and gift, etc. without approval in accordance with
    article 13 or article 20 of the Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation Act
    Article 25 (Penal provisions) (1) Any person who violates Article 24 (1) shall be
    punished by imprisonment for not more than three years or by a fine not
    exceeding thirty million won; provided that the same shall not apply to cases
    where the effect of the inter-Korean agreements (limited to the ones that
    stipulate the prohibited act under each subparagraph of Article 24 (1)) has been
    suspended in accordance with article 23 (2) and (3).
    For more details on this amendment, please find the attached briefing of the
    Development of the inter-Korean Relations Act.

The purpose of this bill is to silence North Korean human rights and religious activities
and voices from South Korean soil, in pursuit of the development of improved inter-
Korean relations. However, sacrificing such basic freedoms and criminalising activities
that promote democracy and human rights are not the right approaches to inter-
Korean relations, especially given South Korea’s democratic constitutional rule of law,
based on protection for basic human rights of freedom of speech, expression, and
religion or belief.
If this bill is signed into law by President Moon Jae-in, there are no more platforms on
the Korean peninsula for promoting North Koreans’ human rights and dignity as
enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This is a great undermining of the recognition
of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the
democratic family is the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace. Moreover, this will
cause great social and political insecurity for over 33,000 North Korean escapees
residing in Seoul, despite their status as recognised South Korean nationals under the
one Korea policy.
We understand that the United Kingdom continues to support the peacebuilding
process and human rights on the Korean peninsula. This was one of the reasons Her
Majesty’s Government had provided tens of thousands of British soldiers and suffered
thousands of casualties during the Korean War of 1950-53. Unfortunately, Korea’s
division remains until today and the human rights violations and nuclear development
in the DPRK cause great security tension and peace threats in the Asian Pacific and
beyond.
Given the British Government’s efforts to address the current situation in Korea, we
urge you to speak out regarding these concerns about the amendment to the Inter-
Korean Relations Act, and to raise these issues with the Government of the Republic
of Korea as a matter of urgency. As a UN Security Council Member and a leading
proponent of sanctions on the DPRK in view of the regime’s nuclear programme and
human rights violations, we hope the United Kingdom will urge South Korea to
reconsider this amendment.
Please do not hesitate to request further information about the amendment to the Inter-
Korean Relations Act Amendment. You can contact us through Lord Alton of Liverpool.

Yours sincerely,

Lord Alton of Liverpool, Co-Chair All Party Parliamentary Group on North Korea,

Thae Yong-ho, Former DPRK Deputy Ambassador to the United Kingdom London &
Member of the South Korean National Assembly


Ji Seong-ho, North Korean escapee & Member of the South Korean National
Assembly


Timothy Cho, British-North Korean escapee & Inquiry Clerk to the All-Parliamentary
Group on North Korea


Benedict Rogers, Deputy Chair of the Conservative Party Human Rights
Commission and Senior Analyst, East Asia, at CSW


Jihyun Park, British-North Korean escapee & Human Rights Activist


Dr. Jieun Baek, Fellow at Belfer Centre, Harvard Kennedy School & Founder/Codirector
of Lumen


Greg Scarlatoiu, Executive Director, Committee For Human rights in North Korea.

Lord David Alton

For 18 years David Alton was a Member of the House of Commons and today he is an Independent Crossbench Life Peer in the UK House of Lords.

Social Media

Site Search

Recent Posts

In advance of Monday’s House of Commons forthcoming vote  on the All Party House of Lords Genocide Amendment, Parliament was told that the Government is hiding behind the fiction of an imaginary judicial mechanism that will hold the CCP accountable for its genocide of the Xinjiang Uighurs. Last night, speaking to a Webinar organised by the Faiths United Youth Network David Alton said that trade deals had become more important than Genocide- “a word which dares not speak its name.”

In advance of Monday’s House of Commons forthcoming vote on the All Party House of Lords Genocide Amendment, Parliament was told that the Government is hiding behind the fiction of an imaginary judicial mechanism that will hold the CCP accountable for its genocide of the Xinjiang Uighurs. Last night, speaking to a Webinar organised by the Faiths United Youth Network David Alton said that trade deals had become more important than Genocide- “a word which dares not speak its name.”

In advance of Monday's House of Commons...

Government Questioned Today about massacre at Axum in Tigray, and allegations of crimes against humanity. In written replies it says it is unable to “verify reports that this includes the transfer of military equipment and money by the Government of Ethiopia to the Government of Eritrea”; “condemns the destruction of the Hitsats and Shimbella refugee camps in Tigray” and forced return of refugees would contravene the 1951 Refugee Convention; and says ” We are keeping the provision of aid to Ethiopia under constant review.”

Government Questioned Today about massacre at Axum in Tigray, and allegations of crimes against humanity. In written replies it says it is unable to “verify reports that this includes the transfer of military equipment and money by the Government of Ethiopia to the Government of Eritrea”; “condemns the destruction of the Hitsats and Shimbella refugee camps in Tigray” and forced return of refugees would contravene the 1951 Refugee Convention; and says ” We are keeping the provision of aid to Ethiopia under constant review.”

Government Questioned Today about massacre at...

For the Uyghurs, Genocide is a word which dares not speak its name. For the sake of women like Rahima Mahmut, Gulzira Auelkhan, Sayragul Sauytbay, and Ruqiye Perhat – whose heart-breaking, shocking, stories are recorded here – it’s time that the crime of genocide was given definition in the UK. On January 19th Parliament can use its voice and speak that name – insisting on justice for victims of Genocide and refusing to make tawdry trade deals with those responsible for the crime above all crimes.

For the Uyghurs, Genocide is a word which dares not speak its name. For the sake of women like Rahima Mahmut, Gulzira Auelkhan, Sayragul Sauytbay, and Ruqiye Perhat – whose heart-breaking, shocking, stories are recorded here – it’s time that the crime of genocide was given definition in the UK. On January 19th Parliament can use its voice and speak that name – insisting on justice for victims of Genocide and refusing to make tawdry trade deals with those responsible for the crime above all crimes.

For the Uyghurs Genocide is a word which dares...

Share This