The influential Secondary Legislative Scrutiny Committee of the House of Lords has issued a report highly critical of UK Government’s approach to imposing abortion on Northern Ireland

Apr 25, 2020 | News

houses of parliament on red wednesday

The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee this week discussed the submissions made about the Abortions (Northern Ireland) Regulations (SI 2020/345) 

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/255/secondary-legislation-scrutiny-committee/publications/

As I and others have argued, throughout, a sensitive and controversial issue of this nature should have been decided in Northern Ireland not imposed by Westminster. Both Parliament and the Northern Ireland Office have shown great contempt for the people of Northern Ireland – and for normal constitutional and parliamentary good practice –  in seeking to impose, by diktat, laws which in the rest of the UK have led to one child in the womb being aborted every three minutes – and right up to birth in the case of babies with disabilities.

 

What this important Report highlights is that this issue needs to be reconsidered in Northern Ireland by the Assembly which is responsible for what the law and policy on this issue. Riding roughshod over the Assembly in this way shows contempt for devolution, power sharing, proper political process, and the people of Northern Ireland.

 


Here are the Report’s key paragraphs. 

  1. “Public consultation began on 4 November 2019 and lasted for a period of six weeks. In our view this is too short for so sensitive a topic. Added to which, it took place during the General Election period and in the run up to Christmas, neither of which conforms with best practice. Of the over 21,000 responses received, 79%registered general opposition to any change to the established position in Northern Ireland.”

 

  1. “While acknowledging that due to the current coronavirus crisis,  Ministers have had much to occupy them, we find it regrettable that the Government chose to lay so controversial an instrument just as a recess started and, more importantly, so close to the implementation date set out in the 2019 Act, thereby denying Parliament an opportunity for scrutiny before the instrument came into effect.”

=============================================

This is what Right To Life had to say in response to the Report:

 

Committee highly critical of UK Government’s approach to imposing abortion on Northern Ireland

 

The influential Secondary Legislative Scrutiny Committee has released a report which is highly critical of the UK Government’s approach to imposing abortion on Northern Ireland.

 

The Committee has highlighted a number of concerns with the new regulations including the following:

  • “Public consultation began on 4 November 2019 and lasted for a period of six weeks. In our view this is too short for so sensitive a topic. Added to which, it took place during the General Election period and in the run up to Christmas, neither of which conforms with best practice. ” (pg. 10, para 43)
  • “While acknowledging that due to the current coronavirus crisis, Ministers have had much to occupy them, we find it regrettable that the Government chose to lay so controversial an instrument just as a recess started and, more importantly, so close to the implementation date set out in the 2019 Act, thereby denying Parliament an opportunity for scrutiny before the instrument came into effect.” (pg. 11, para 46)
  • “Of the over 21,000 responses received, 79% registered general opposition to any change to the established position in Northern Ireland.” (pg. 11, para 43)

 

A majority of submissions received by the Committee were critical of the regulations. This included submissions from across the community in Northern Ireland including disability groups, MPs, MLAs, charities and the Attorney General of Northern Ireland.

 

The Attorney General, John Larkin QC, was critical of disability provisions in the regulation which allow for abortions for disabilities including cleft lip, club foot and Down’s syndrome right up to birth. 

 

Right To Life UK also raised a number of problems with the regulations in a submission which it asked the Committee to draw to the attention of the House. 

 

The Committee has raised these concerns ahead of the regulations being voted by MPs and Peers ahead of 17 May 2020.

Spokesperson for Right to Life UK, Catherine Robinson said:

“These regulations legalise sex-selective abortion and introduce abortion for babies with disabilities including cleft lip, club foot and Down’s syndrome to birth. They introduce defacto abortion-on-demand to Northern Ireland through to 24-weeks. 

They also open up abortion provision to midwives and nurses. This goes much further than the law In England and Wales, where abortions can only be performed by a doctor and the Abortion Act requires the approval of two doctors before an abortion can be performed.  

The influential Committee has chosen to draw these regulations to the special attention of the House. The Committee has reported on a number of serious issues with the regulations. MPs and Peers at Westminster must take on board these problems and vote against the regulations when they are brought before Parliament.” 

 

Lord David Alton

For 18 years David Alton was a Member of the House of Commons and today he is an Independent Crossbench Life Peer in the UK House of Lords.

Social Media

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Site Search

Recent Posts

Replies to Parliamentary Questions on the number of people who are dying of hunger or who are food insecure in Sudan; how quickly the UK decision to increase humanitarian aid for war victims in Sudan will be made available; what it will be used for; and how it will be deployed; and the impact of the war in Sudan on South Sudan, including (1) the numbers of displaced people and refugees, and (2) the impact on its economy caused by the loss of receipts from the export of oil

Lord Benyon, the Foreign, Commonwealth and...

Meeting in Parliament to highlight the malign effects of Hong Kong’s Article 23 on human rights; to examine its impact on media freedom, in advance of World Press Freedom Day on May 3rd; to express solidarity with Jimmy Lai and 1841 other imprisoned pro democracy advocates; and to consider how Hong Kong’s Security Laws impact on civil society, the diaspora and contribute to transnational repression. Contributions from Benedict Rogers, Steve Vines, Caoilfhionn Gallagher KC, and Carmen Lau. The banning of a Simpsons episode about the Tiananmen Square massacre “Nothing Happened Here” cited as an example of the suppression of truth.

Lord Alton of Liverpool (David Alton) as a...

Share This